Daniel Radcliffe Vanity Fair Photos

Poster	Message
XxTodd SeamusxX Rank : 778	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 22 20:40 - I found it rather disturbing to see this side of Daniel. After all he is kinda like i dunno, but a lot of kids like harry potter.haha. . . Wouldn't you say so?. . .
Adrenaline junkie Rank : 216	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 22 20:46 - haha that was so funny when my freind told me about this. i laughed so hard, hopefully the hourse didn't mistake his umm "equiptment" for a carrot.
XxTodd SeamusxX Rank : 778	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 22 21:42 - haha. No i actually found it rather, disturbing. i mean there are a LOT of children who love harry potter. & for them to see this. 0__o.
Youko Rank : 2114	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 22 21:57 - Harry Potter sucks
XxTodd SeamusxX Rank : 778	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 22 22:48 - Actually, i am a little bit of a fan. not obsessed.these photographs did upset me.
Vincent Valentine Rank : 147	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 22 22:49 - AAAAAAH BURN EM BURN EM!!!!! SEND EM TO HELL!!!!! Seriously disturbing.
Charis Rank : 282	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 22 22:53 - Why would children see it if it was in Vanity Fair? You're kind of exposing it to younging's by posting it here.... I encourage Daniel Radcliffe's artistic expression, the Harry Potter movies aren't very good.
silent killer Rank : 146	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 23 0:58 - Yeah, not that disturbing since at the very least he keeps his pants on in the photos. Looks like its promoting the play he's in. Either that or Vanity Fair pulled another Miley. the useless things one learns watching late night talk shows.
chibiyusa Rank : 57	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 23 1:02 - Well apparently he's going to be naked in the next Harry Potter film. Or so they say.
Charis Rank : 282	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 23 1:19 - Naked? Hm...I doubt they would show that in a children's movie. But if they do...0_o
tartan_skirt VIP Rank : 4	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 23 5:08 - Personally I think he was just anticipating the need to escape being known only as "that guy that played Harry Potter" and making a move on it before the series ended. The controversy caused by this just proves that he's not going to leave the HP series lacking in reputation. Either that or Vanity Fair pulled another Miley. The different being that she is a 15 year old already with controvesy, and I believe he was 18 at the time. That and its America, and Disney, where everything must be sacarine sweet and wrapped in an image that cannot be broken for fear of someone, somewhere complaining. I trust Leibovitz and her right to artistic statement and think the photos were tastefully done, and I believe she was also the photographer for the Radcliffe ones (I think). On a personal note, I'm not really a Harry Potter fan and I slightly glad the image of fantasy has been broken for actual fans. Brings them back down to earth.
Foxninja Rank : 119	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 23 9:47 - I'd rather remeber him as the "Guy who played Harry Potter" for i find these images rather disturbing. Haha T.J. i had the exact same thought.
XxTodd SeamusxX Rank : 778	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 23 14:07 - Well children don't read vanity fair magazine, but they do watch television. which is where it showed. parents would be upset. i am one of them.
Adrenaline junkie Rank : 216	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 23 14:10 - your a parent? my parents told me about it and it made me laugh, why get upset?.
tartan_skirt VIP Rank : 4	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 23 14:11 - Well children don't watch vanity fair, but they do watch television. which is where it showed. parents would be upset. i am one of them. You have to be kidding me. I actually accuse you of just talking bollocks there. Vanity Fair is a magazine. And this was publicity posters for a play, not TV. Get your media types right.
ietchi and italki	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 23 14:15 This message has been deleted. Reason: junk
XxTodd SeamusxX Rank : 778	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 23 15:11 - Aye.i am. i do know that it was for a play, but it was fkn everywhere.
Charis Rank : 282	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 23 15:14 - So you encourage censorship, then?
XxTodd SeamusxX Rank : 778	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 23 15:16 - i guess so. but then again, i quite understand after all he is 19.bt stil...
Charis Rank : 282	Posted : 3 months ago at Aug 24 1:43 - Just because people find it disturbing doesn't mean we should keep it out of magazines that are directed towards adults. If you want to live in a world where people remain the innocent "Harry Potter" for the rest of their lives, then don't go on the internet or read Vanity Fair. I know it's disturbing to you, but that's no reason to claim that others shouldn't do certain things.
XxTodd SeamusxX Rank : 778	Posted : 2 months, 4 weeks ago at Aug 24 11:52 - True, he is growing up & harry potter won't be for long. just 2 more years.
Dionysian Child Rank : 76	Posted : 2 months, 3 weeks ago at Aug 26 12:45 - Weren't the photos for the play he did a year or so ago called 'Equus'. Inspired by an actually event of a similar basis it’s about a young stable boy who becomes worryingly obsessed with horses, his relationship with his girlfriend and psychiatrist. One scene required Daniel to go nude in it, whilst the rest of the play dealt with dark emotional turmoil, religious and sexual deviations. So the publicity photos, and the play itself were more of a conscious decision by him to change his type cast and challenge the views the public held of him... not Vanity Fair exploiting him, as a naive young boy.
GemLil Moderator Rank : 15	Posted : 2 months, 3 weeks ago at Aug 26 12:56 - Dio is correct, these were the publicity photos from the play Equus! This is well 2007 people, I've seen the full frontal nude photo of him, had in in my pictures folder but my comp had to be restored and a I couldn't find it again. He is quite well endowed. He decided he wanted to get away from his child/innocent image and get into some real acting..he did well, you people don't know what you're talking about.
350125g0 Rank : 83	Posted : 2 months, 3 weeks ago at Aug 26 20:45 - Kudos to him for stepping outside of what he's "known for" and doing something different.
silent killer Rank : 146	Posted : 2 months, 3 weeks ago at Aug 26 23:42 - Ugh. I was joking. internet fails at sarcasm 'splodes Apparently, Equus is coming to Broadway. Hence the Vanity fair spread. Saw him on Conan O'Brian last night.
XxTodd SeamusxX Rank : 778	Posted : 2 months, 3 weeks ago at Aug 30 20:49 - i saw him on jay leno. inspiring play. guess i was wrong.